Roland Barthes: Structural Cultural Analysis
This text is a preview of History of the Reception of Hegel, volume II, to be published in 2026 by Reflexivity Press.
From Literature to the Mythology of Everyday Life
Roland Barthes (1915-1980) transferred the structuralist method to cultural analysis – fashion, advertising, photography, everyday mythologies.[1] His early works – Le Degré zéro de l’écriture (1953), Mythologies (1957), Éléments de sémiologie (1964) – made structuralism popular.
Mythologies analyzed everyday phenomena as sign systems: the Citroën DS as a myth of modernity, Greta Garbo’s face as an ideal type, wrestling as a spectacle of justice. Barthes showed that even the seemingly most “natural” things – a steak, a commercial, a magazine cover – are coded, laden with meaning, ideological.
The Death of the Author
Barthes’ most famous essay, “La mort de l’auteur” (1967), drew the structuralist consequence for literary criticism.[2] The traditional question was: what did the author want to say? What was his intention? His life, his psychology, his historical context – all of this was supposed to explain what the text “means.”
Barthes argued that the author is a fiction. The text is a fabric of quotations, allusions, and codes drawn from various sources – from language, culture, tradition. The author does not “write” in the sense of “invent” – he combines, varies, transforms. The text is not a “product” of the author, but a “field” in which various discourses intersect.
The consequence: it is not the author who gives the text meaning, but the reader. But “reader” here is not the empirical individual, but the crossing-point where the various codes converge. With the death of the author, the reader is born – but as a function, not as a person.
—